
Besent's Remarks Draw Market Attention
Recently, U.S. Treasury Secretary Besent remarked that the Federal Reserve's policy rate might be more than 1 percentage point higher than appropriate. He emphasized that "regardless of the model used," there should be support for a rate cut of 150 to 175 basis points. This statement quickly gained traction in the market, sparking widespread debate among investors about the future of monetary policy. Given Besent's significant influence in policy and financial markets, some market participants interpreted his comments as aligning with the White House's economic strategy.
However, analysts quickly pointed out that this claim lacks substantial model support. Academics and investment banks began to search various policy rules in an attempt to find logical backing for Besent's viewpoint, but the results were not encouraging.
Deutsche Bank Team Highlights Data Discrepancy
The Deutsche Bank interest rate strategy team, led by Matthew Raskin, clearly stated in their latest research that they found no empirical model supporting Besent's rate cut speculations. Raskin, who has long worked at the Federal Reserve and is familiar with internal policy assessment frameworks, pointed out that the main rules used in the Federal Reserve's semi-annual monetary policy report do not clearly indicate a significant rate cut, let alone an adjustment of 150 to 175 basis points.
According to Deutsche Bank's calculations, the current federal funds rate level is precisely within the range suggested by the model, approximately between 4% and 4.65%. This implies that even if policy adjustments are necessary, it would only involve a 25 basis point change, rather than the "aggressive rate cuts" mentioned by Besent.
Discrepancy Between Models and Policy
Deutsche Bank's analysis highlights a core issue: the market's overinterpretation of policymakers' statements often overlooks the constraints of actual models. Although the fiscal department may wish to stimulate the economy through looser policies, monetary policy must still be based on inflation and employment dual objectives.
The Raskin team emphasized that current inflation remains above the Federal Reserve's long-term goal, and although there are signs of cooling in the job market, there has not yet been systemic weakness. These conditions determine the insufficient necessity for substantial rate cuts, and the Federal Reserve is more likely to adopt a cautious and gradual approach to address economic uncertainties.
Investors Need to Maintain Rational Expectations
The market fluctuations caused by Besent's comments indicate that investors remain highly sensitive to monetary policy. However, Deutsche Bank's clarification warns the market not to solely rely on the perspectives of certain officials or the fiscal department to predict the Federal Reserve's next moves. In practice, decision-makers will rely more on economic data and model frameworks, especially in a context where inflation is not yet fully controlled.
As the September policy meeting approaches, investor focus will remain on the upcoming inflation and employment data. If inflation does not fall as expected, aggressive rate cuts are nearly impossible. Deutsche Bank's view may serve as a "calming agent" for the market, reminding investors to adjust overly high easing expectations and re-evaluate fundamental data.






